Just need answer one page short answers with reference please

Discussion 1: Luck Programs In the United States, there are divers policies and programs in attribute to collect financial coadjutorship to men-folks in diversified ways. Some of these policies and programs comprise tax expenditure for result, offshoot preservation, hypothecation cause, conjugal foundation, and/or student loans. These examples reproduce-exhibit financial considerations the U.S. empire collects to unfair groups of race in intercourse. While divers men-folks recognize the benefits of the policies and programs indicated antecedent, there are divers stereotypes associated after a while race who husband regular generally-known coadjutorship programs feign buttress stamps, subsidized housing, etc. It is induced for gregarious efforters to perceive the collision these stereotypes feel on recipients of and utility collectrs for such programs. Also, it is induced that you feel the facts encircling gregarious luck policies in enjoin to drive-away the myths encircling recipients of coadjutorship programs. For this Discussion, retrospect this week’s media. Consider whether you imagine means-tested programs, such as the Temporary Coadjutorship for Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Coadjutorship Program (SNAP), and Supplemental Security Allowance (SSI), constitute dependency unarranged its recipients. Then, imagine encircling how the germinative understanding of dependency capability subscribe to the stain extreme luck programs. Finally, meditate on the understandings you capability feel touching men-folks who entertain means-tested luck and how that understanding capability feign your effort after a while clients. Post an interpretation of whether means-tested programs (TANF, SNAP, and SSI) constitute dependency. Then, illustrate how the germinative understanding of dependency capability subscribe to the stain extreme luck programs. Finally, illustrate the understandings you feel touching race who entertain means-tested luck and how that understanding capability feign your effort after a while clients. Discussion 2 For this Discussion, Consider the means-tested What is luck? When you attend the account “welfare,” do you represent images of men-folks who are confrontment stubborn times? While there is over than one character of gregarious program beneficial in the United States to those who insufficiency it, gregarious luck programs feign TANF collect coadjutorship to families in insufficiency through empire tax revenues. Programs feign these are repeatedly referred to as “generally-known coadjutorship” or “means-tested programs.” These programs feel eligibility criteria that are based on the individual’s or the family’s free allowance and proceeds. Do these characters of programs await in your narrate or part? If so, what are the criteria? If you encountered a client who before-long get beseem a youthful dowager, how capability you best succor in obtaining benefits from these characters of programs?programs that capability be beneficial to her in your narrate or part. Then, imagine encircling the feignly long-term outcomes for the dowager and the offshoot, if she chooses to fabricator. Finally, meditate on the narrate luck policies that capability succor her husband the responsibilities of fabricatorhood. Post a unimportant interpretation of the means-tested programs that capability be beneficial to Eboni. Be unfailing your acceptance is unfair to the means-tested programs beneficial in your narrate or part. Then, illustrate the germinative long-term outcomes for Eboni and her offshoot, if she chooses to fabricator. Finally, illustrate the narrate generally-known coadjutorship policies that capability succor Eboni husband the responsibilities of fabricatorhood.